Kevin Zou (he/him) wrote a new post on the site Kevolve 48 minutes ago
Communication: a 2-way street
Communication through the lens of performance! In Chapter 1 – Foundations: Defining Communication and Communication Study of Survey of Communication, numerous models of communication are used to represent the definition of communication: “the process of using symbols to exchange meaning.” The first model that was introduced was the Linear Model of Communication, which states that communication is direct from the sender to the receiver (refer to section “Defining Communication”). This method of representing communication, however, does not accurately portray communication in the context of the real-world. It disregards the receiver’s ability to interact with the sender, labeling them as a vessel that only receives information. This is where the Transactional Model of Communication comes in: in this model, the receiver is not a receiver, but instead a communicator. In a world of noise and contexts (e.g. social, cultural, and relational), a transactional approach to communication is more multi-dimensional. Based on the editorial cartoon, the term “audience participation” is emphasized as the image depicts in who I interpret as an audience member walking up to the stage to perform with the actors. In this context, potential noise such as nerves about the spontaneity of having to perform could affect the audience member’s ability to play the role needed for the performance. The Transactional Model of Communcation more accurately depicts this situation as it is more interactive than a 1-way street from the actors to members in the audience. As a dancer, this editorial cartoon relates to my life as a performance is a 2-way street between the dancers on stage and the audience members. For example, the energies of the performer can reach the audience, and vice versa. Etiquette such as cheering and clapping can build onto the energies of the dancers who worked hard to prepare a performance that could be enjoyed by family, friends, and strangers alike. This live interaction between performers is comprised of both verbal and nonverbal forms of communication – not just limited to dancers, but those practicing artistic crafts such as […] “Communication: a 2-way street”
Castle Fong wrote a new post on the site Castle Fong Chapter Post 2 hours, 41 minutes ago
Same message in different time
[…] “Same message in different time”
Nilgun Gungor (she/her) wrote a new post on the site Nilgün Güngör – Communications 1000 blog 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
From Stone Tablets to Tweets: Tracing the Evolution of Human Connection
This editorial cartoon titled “The Evolution of Communication” by The Denver Post traces the development of human communication from the first written word to Twitter, now known as X. Each figure in the cartoon represents a different era: from early writing to movable type, mass publication, email, and finally social media. The final figure, hunched over a phone, tweeting “tweet tweet,” adds a satirical twist, implying that despite technological advancements, the substance of communication may be regressing. This cartoon directly relates to Chapter 4 – History of Communication Study. The image captures the significant shifts in communication tools and practices, from ancient written texts to print culture and eventually to digital and social media. It illustrates how communication has evolved across the time periods discussed in the chapter. That being, from oral traditions in the Classical Period, to the rise of print during The Enlightenment, to the digital explosion in the Present Day. It also reflects concerns raised in communication theory about how newer technologies shape the way we express and receive messages. This image resonates with how quickly communication methods have changed even in my own life. I, for instance, grew up learning to handwrite essays in elementary school, then gradually shifted to computers in middle and high school as technology advanced. Now, I rarely lift pens unless I’m taking quick notes. Otherwise, most of my assignments and communication happen through short texts or social media posts. In school or at work, even among friends, although I’m not old school, I sometimes struggle to balance the speed of modern communication with the clarity and thoughtfulness that older methods require. This cartoon made me realize how these shifts impact notRead More »From Stone Tablets to Tweets: Tracing the Evolution of Human Connection
Nilgun Gungor (she/her) wrote a new post on the site Nilgün Güngör – Communications 1000 blog 3 hours, 24 minutes ago
“Not a Good Start”: Why Clear Communication Matters from the Very Beginning
This cartoon shows a man standing at the front of a seminar titled “COMMUNIKATIONS SEMMINAR” with two glaring spelling errors on the board. A participant sitting in the audience comments, “Well that’s not a good start!” The cartoon humorously highlights the importance of clarity and competence in communication, especially when the communicator is trying to teach communication itself. This cartoon directly relates to Chapter 1 – Foundations: Defining Communication and Communication Study. It emphasizes that communication is not just about delivering a message but also about how well the message is encoded, received, and understood. The image also reflects the concept of noise, a key term in the “Linear Model of Communication.” In this case, the “noise” comes from the misspellings, which distort the intended message and damage the speaker’s credibility. It’s a great example of how breakdowns in encoding can lead to miscommunication and affect how a message is perceived. I can definitely relate to this moment, whether it’s sending a text with a typo or turning in a paper with small errors, it’s clear that how we present our message really matters. In school, at work, or even among friends, I’ve noticed that people are quick to judge, especially based on first impressions and in written or public communication. This cartoon is a comical reminder that communication isn’tRead More »“Not a Good Start”: Why Clear Communication Matters from the Very Beginning
Mirabella Pesin wrote a new post on the site Mirabella's Weekly Posts 6 hours, 14 minutes ago
Mirabella Pesin wrote a new post on the site Mirabella's Weekly Posts 6 hours, 52 minutes ago
Renee Montperous wrote a new post on the site Renee’s Communication Connection – Weekly Reflections Blog 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Are We Even Listening Anymore?
The cartoon I chose shows two employees talking about their boss, saying, “When I first started working here, I thought our boss would be a good listener. But, that hasn’t been the case.” This ties perfectly into what we’ve been learning in this chapter, especially under the key term “listening skills” and the subheading “barriers to effective communication.” The cartoon shows how poor listening, especially from someone in a leadership role, can really impact the workplace environment. This also ties in with what the article mentioned about the growing number of communication ethics courses on college campuses. These classes are designed to help students think about the deeper meaning behind how we communicate not just speaking, but really listening with purpose. It’s more than just sharing your opinion. It’s about being fully present, paying attention to others, and showing respect. That kind of mindful listening is exactly what’s missing in the cartoon and unfortunately, in a lot of real workplaces too. I can relate to this cartoon personally. At one of my past jobs, I had a manager who would ask for feedback but then ignore what we said. It made us feel unheard and frustrated, and eventually no one even bothered speaking up. That’s exactly what poor communication can lead to silence and disconnection. Reading about the development of communication as its own academic field really makes me appreciate how important this stuff is, not just in theory, but in everyd […] “Are We Even Listening Anymore?”
Renee Montperous wrote a new post on the site Renee’s Communication Connection – Weekly Reflections Blog 14 hours, 48 minutes ago
Talk to Me not the screen
This cartoon connects to the chapter “Foundations: Defining Communication and Communication Study.” A key term from the chapter is “Communication Happens in Context.” The dinner table is a place where family members are expected to talk and spend time together. The woman is upset because the person across from her is not paying attention; they’re on their phone instead of engaging. Her angry comment is an example of nonverbal and verbal communication working together. Her face and words both show frustration and a demand for respect in that social moment. This reminds me of times when people around me including myself have used our phones during important moments, like when we’re out for dinner, instead of being fully present with each other. It can feel like the phone matters more than the people in front of you. I’ve seen situations where someone gets upset because no one is really “there” in the moment. This cartoon reminds me how important it is to be fully present, especially with people who care abo […] “Talk to Me not the screen”
Castle Fong wrote a new post on the site Castle Fong Chapter Post 16 hours, 50 minutes ago
'Telephone' in real life
This cartoon connects well with the first chapter of the book. In this chapter, authors introduced two models of communication – Linear Model and Transactional Model. In the Linear Model, communication directly flows from sender to receiver, but noise—anything that interferes with the message—can disrupt that process. In this cartoon, it showcases an office space, where co-workers/receivers misinterpreted the sender’s original message from ‘communication skills’ to ‘forgotten his pills’. This misinterpretation was created when confusion compounded by another participant interpreting the behavior as forgetfulness, showing how quickly a message can break down due to noise in the channel. The confusion of this cartoon further reinforces the element of the Linear Model and its idea of noise. This can relate to my everyday life when it comes to text messaging my friends, family and coworkers. For example, if I type something autocorrect changes (like “skills” to “spills”), the person receiving it might misunderstand the entire message because of my mistake. In this situation, the noise would be the auto-correct feature of my phone’s software. Like the characters in the cartoon, the conversation can easily go off track if the receiver interprets the message differently than intended. This shows how even in simple communication, noise can significant […] “‘Telephone’ in real life”
Anthony Picciano wrote a new post on the site Tony's Thoughts 19 hours, 41 minutes ago
CNN's Dana Bash Grills Hakeen Jeffries on Democratic Party’s Dismal Polling: The American People Are ‘Frustrated With You!’
Dana Bash and Hakeem Jeffries Dear Commons Community, CNN anchor Dana Bash grilled House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) on […]
This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
No Comments